A Network of Bible Prophecy Teachers
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Dr. Alan Kurschner responded to the flawed, circular nature of pretribulationism in determining if a Scriptural passage teaches imminence.
He critiqued Wayne A. Brindle’s four general criteria that have been used to establish imminence theology in pretribulation literature.
Sign up to become a monthly Ministry Partner
Dr. Alan Kurschner shows why the most common argument for pretribulationism does not work. Please consider giving monthly Become an Eschatos Partner by
Dr. Alan Kurschner explained the problem with identifying Matthew 24:30 with the battle of Armageddon in Revelation 19. He responded to this standard pretrib interpretation
Dr. Alan Kurschner points out a massive inconsistency in the theology of amillennialism that claims that the binding of Satan depicted in Revelation 20:1–3 describes
Dr. Alan Kurschner discussed historicism, which is the eschatological position that says the thrust of prophecy in the Olivet Discourse and Revelation was fulfilled in
Dr. Alan Kurschner discusses the weakness of pretribulation rapture theology concerning how the fifth seal relates (or does not relate) to Paul’s promise in 1
